Politech is the oldest Internet resource devoted to politics and technology. Launched in 1994 by Declan McCullagh, the mailing list has chronicled the growing intersection of law, culture, technology, and politics. Since 2000, so has the Politech web site.
What happens to BitTorrent after Grokster ruling by Supreme Court?
Previous Politech message:
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: What Happens to BitTorrent After Grokster?
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 09:53:06 -0500
From: Mark F. Schultz <email@example.com>
To: Declan McCullagh <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Like every other IP law professor in the universe, I'm blogging on
Grokster (as a guest at Eric
Goldman's Technology and Marketing blog). I thought that you and your
readers might be among those
who would be particularly interested in a take on what happens to
BitTorrent. Bottom line: Bram
Cohen and BitTorrent as a technology are fine, sites like Suprnova are not.
What Happens to BitTorrent After Grokster?
By Mark Schultz, Assistant Professor, Southern Illinois School of Law
BitTorrent and its creator, Bram Cohen, should be just fine. Some
services that use BitTorrent to
promote infringing file sharing for commercial gain, like the now
defunct Suprnova.org, are most
likely in trouble. The difference in results points to one fortunate
aspect of today’s decision. The
Court’s holding focuses on “bad actors,” not “bad technology.” In that
respect the safe harbor of
Sony still stands. (Whether the prospect of having to defend oneself as
a “good actor” will stifle
technological development is a subject for another post or a law review
Posted by Declan McCullagh on Jun 29, 2005
in category intellectual-property
Get a Politech feed through RSS or Atom
The Politech general information pages and
photographs are copyrighted by Declan
McCullagh. Original posts distributed to the mailing list are licensed under a Creative