Politech is the oldest Internet resource devoted to politics and
technology. Launched in 1994 by Declan
McCullagh, the mailing list has chronicled the growing
intersection of culture, technology, politics, and law. Since
2000, so has the Politech web site.
National Review lauds anti-porn activists, 1,000% tax on smut
- Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2002 18:25:34 -0500
- To: politech@politechbot.com
- Subject: FC: National Review lauds anti-porn activists, 1,000% tax on smut
- From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
- Cc: jnordlinger@nationalreview.com
---
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 14:32:17 -0500
From: "Bruce Taylor" <BruceTaylor@NationalLawCenter.org>
Subject: National Review article with kudos for us and our allies.
Below is an excerpt from the full National Review online column by Jay
Nordlinger, NR's Managing Editor. The link to the full column
is: http://www.nationalreview.com/impromptus/impromptus010702.shtml
( I think Jan LaRue of FRC made us look good, among the warriors for
decency through law. Thanks, Jan! )
Helen Thomas, leftist style, heroes of anti-porn, &c.
January 7, 2002 8:50 a.m.
NRonline.com
In the previous Impromptus, I mentioned pornographic e-mail spam, and how I
hated it. I said that this spam had a particular predilection for
pedophilia, incest, and bestiality. I also praised the anti-porn activists,
who come in for so much abuse: They're called prudes and killjoys;
anti-Constitutionalists and enemies of the Bill of Rights. I also pointed
out that their work is often lonely, because the subject is so disgusting —
especially where young children are concerned — that most people would
rather turn away, would rather not know about it, much less try to do
anything about it. (Incidentally, I explored this subject at length in a
piece titled "Getting Aroused" in the Nov. 19 National Review).
The item provoked a torrent of e-mail, much of which said, "I would like to
help — who are the people laboring in this vineyard?" There are many, I'm
happy to say, and they're truly doing the Lord's work, and not just the
Lord's, but ours: In a significant way, they're doing it in our stead. It's
the kind of work most of us would like to see done, but we lack either the
time or the will to do it.
Let me mention a few workers in the field: There's Pat Trueman of the
American Family Association. There's Jan LaRue at the Family Research
Council, and Miriam Moore of that same organization. There's Bruce Taylor,
president of the National Law Center for Children and Families. There are
Phil and Vickie Burress at Citizens for Community Values. There's Jay
Sekulow at the American Center for Law and Justice. There's a marvelous
California group called Enough is Enough (in which Donna Rice — of Gary
Hart scandal fame — has participated). There is Morality in Media. And so on.
I'm sure I'm forgetting important ones, to my shame. But at least I've
presented a few for the honor roll.
Let me repeat one thing I've learned in studying this issue (particularly
in preparation for that magazine piece I mentioned): It is one of the
pornographers' best allies, most potent weapons, that so many people think
that nothing can be done about the worst of the porn, that American law and
American values tie our hands — that we just have to abide it, else we hate
Thomas Jefferson.
It's not true, y'all. Not true at all. Get aroused, if you dare.
Note this interesting letter from a reader:
"A couple of years ago, I wrote a book on networking. In the chapter on
domain-name service, I wanted to give an example of an Internet domain name
that was objectionable but not yet used. It was very hard to find one:
boyrape.com, kidsex.com (registered to one Lee Myun Jong), boysex.com
(registered to a company in Switzerland), and so on are all real domains
that are open for business. When we're finished with the terrorists, I hope
we have a few daisy cutters left for these bastards."
And how about the following?
"Remember 'sin' taxes on alcohol and tobacco? Why not apply them to
pornography? Say at the rate of 100-1,000 % of gross billing. Subject
financial intermediaries to, oh, a 20 % tax on their top line even if only
one single dollar was derived from that industry. And of course, dedicate
100 % of the tax revenue to fund health care for the children. As a side
benefit, after a little tinkering, this tax could be true payback to the
Hollywood crowd."
That's using the old noggin.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list
You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice.
Declan McCullagh's photographs are at http://www.mccullagh.org/
To subscribe to Politech: http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Return to politechbot.com