Politech is the oldest Internet resource devoted to politics and
technology. Launched in 1994 by Declan
McCullagh, the mailing list has chronicled the growing
intersection of culture, technology, politics, and law. Since
2000, so has the Politech web site.
Financial Times commentary: It's time to tax all email!
- Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 00:40:25 -0400
- To: politech@politechbot.com
- Subject: FC: Financial Times commentary: It's time to tax all email!
- From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
[Anyone remember that UN report talking about an email tax -- a
thinly-disguised wealth transfer to African governments? --Declan]
---
Date: Sun, 04 May 2003 23:53:51 -0700
To: declan@well.com
From: "Roger E. Rustad, Jr."
Subject: FT editorial: taxing e-mail in the hopes of canning spam
An editorial that might interest Politech subscribers:
http://news.ft.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=FT.com/StoryFT/FullStory&c=StoryFT&cid=1051389718756
Christopher Caldwell criticizes current attempts to regulate spam. Re:
Lessig's bounty-on-spammer proposal:
"This is a terrible idea that will make millionaires of two classes of
people: reprobates who illegally maraud through others' hard drives; and
those who have built their expertise about spam by peddling it."
He considers the recent FTC spam conference "barking up the wrong tree,"
and thinks that the simplest way to regulate spam is through a tax:
"The simplest way to regulate spam is through a tax. This requires smashing
some myths. A decade ago, Americans were gulled by politicians of both
parties into believing that taxing the internet exceeded the government's
capability. When that proved to be manifestly untrue, they were told that a
tax would be an affront to some mythic libertarian "spirit of the
internet". The tax moratorium on internet sales has always been supremely
unfair, offering, say, Amazon a de facto subsidy against taxpaying local
bookstores.
But, very soon, the Internet should turn into a penny post, with a levy of
1 cent per letter. This would cost the average e-mailer about $10 a year.
Small companies would pay bills in the hundreds of dollars; very large ones
in the thousands. And spammers would be driven to honest employment. The
tax could be made progressive by exempting, say, those who sent fewer than
5,000 letters a year. The proceeds could go to maintain and expand bandwidth."
(If you fwd to the list, please remove my e-mail)
Thx,
Roger
contributing editor
GrepLaw.org
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list
You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe to Politech: http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
Declan McCullagh's photographs are at http://www.mccullagh.org/
Like Politech? Make a donation here: http://www.politechbot.com/donate/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Return to politechbot.com